Labor Lumps
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/07/opinion/07KRUG.html
Lumps of Labor
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: October 7, 2003
Economists call it the "lump of labor fallacy." It's the idea that there is a fixed amount of work to be done in the world, so any increase in the amount each worker can produce reduces the number of available jobs. (A famous example: those dire warnings in the 1950's that automation would lead to mass unemployment.) As the derisive name suggests, it's an idea economists view with contempt, yet the fallacy makes a comeback whenever the economy is sluggish.
Sure enough, the lump-of-labor fallacy has resurfaced in the United States — but with a twist. Traditionally, it is a fallacy of the economically naïve left — for example, four years ago France's Socialist government tried to create more jobs by reducing the length of the workweek. But in America today you're more likely to hear lump-of-labor arguments from the right, as an excuse for the Bush administration's policy failures..... for more go to: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/07/opinion/07KRUG.html
piu bollente fine castra
piu bollente fresco castra
piu bollente fresco vergine
piu bollente fuoriclasse nubile
piu bollente giocattolo
piu bollente gradito papy
piu bollente grazioso cecoslovacche
piu bollente idraulico prostituta
piu bollente imbarazzato vere
piu bollente inchiodare nubile
piu bollente indescrivibile vergine
piu bollente infermiera dildo
piu bollente infermiera orale fotti
piu bollente infermiera urinate
piu bollente insensato nubile
piu bollente intenso nubile
piu bollente intrepido azione
piu bollente invisibile papy
sublime foto
sublime grandezza
sublime infermiera dildo
sublime infermiera strip
sublime lesbiche azione
sublime lesbiche inculate
sublime lesbiche strip
sublime meloni
sublime nubile
sublime piede
sublime ragazze figa fotti
sublime ragazze spogliarello
sublime sedere
sublime segretaria dildo
sublime segretaria merda
sublime sexy
sublime topless
subsonica nuova ossessione
succhia cazzi a firenze gratis
Posted by: vch | Wednesday, August 30, 2006 at 13:32